hmg3: a little Christmas gift for you
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:10 pm
Hello everyone.
It is true that was born HMG4, but many of us use HMG3 and so I decided to propose a small upgrade to the functions "MSG ....";
Obviously, I was inspired by HMG4.
Roberto: HMG is a great job. I hope do you like my tiny job and think of it like a little Christmas gift (too late
) to you.
Unfortunately, I can not generate the library HMG3
and then I could not fully verify the goodness of my work 
. In fact, as you can see, there is no reference to HMG 
Anyway, I could check the operation with the last version of Harbour (v. 2.1.0 (r?????) nigthly version).
The sources are:
- c_msgbox.c: replace the current
- h_msgbox.prg: replace the current (note 1)
- h_control.prg: a new source in order to new implementations
- test.prg: a program for testing
Note 1. In the official version of "HMG3" there is activation of "ProcessMessages()" at line 154.
I could not put it in the source for the reason that I described above. Also, I can not understand why this statement is only present in the function "MsgBox".
Best regards and Happy New Year to all
It is true that was born HMG4, but many of us use HMG3 and so I decided to propose a small upgrade to the functions "MSG ....";
Obviously, I was inspired by HMG4.Roberto: HMG is a great job. I hope do you like my tiny job and think of it like a little Christmas gift (too late
) to you.Unfortunately, I can not generate the library HMG3
and then I could not fully verify the goodness of my work . In fact, as you can see, there is no reference to HMG Anyway, I could check the operation with the last version of Harbour (v. 2.1.0 (r?????) nigthly version).
The sources are:
- c_msgbox.c: replace the current
- h_msgbox.prg: replace the current (note 1)
- h_control.prg: a new source in order to new implementations
- test.prg: a program for testing
Note 1. In the official version of "HMG3" there is activation of "ProcessMessages()" at line 154.
I could not put it in the source for the reason that I described above. Also, I can not understand why this statement is only present in the function "MsgBox".
Best regards and Happy New Year to all