srvet_claudio wrote:Hello Friends,
they think of these questions:
srvet_claudio wrote:The IDE has had several versions since birth (identified with dates).
What do you consider should be appropriate the number of this version?
1.0.3 is an appropriate number?
Thanks.
The version 1.0.3 does not gives a false impression that it is a new IDE ?
Please give me your opinion.
Hi dear Claudio, as I mentioned in
my previous message, I agree with IDE version, it is also important and thanks for your implementations as always very much appreciated to everybody.
But I think there are some IDE pendings already presented at my message
HMG 3.1.5 - Improvements and corrections (click here to access the topic) and I did not found your opinion about these:
1. IDE error msg for "Invalid project name" (
Item # 7, click here to access the topic)
2. Rest of items of following points: (
Item # 10, click here to access the topic)
- Sequence data from the IDE's title.
Project name (without ".hbp") + "at" + project path + IDE version.
(IMHO, without UNICODE/ANSI descriptions, only by ico's color is enough)
- StatusBar (first item), could it be removed the string "Compiler"
(Let it just with HMG version)
- Join all new Ini files (created at 1.0.3 version) to just one ini file.
(Language.ini + Editor.ini + Version ==> Hmg.ini)
- In Tools/Preferences at module Editor option. Detection default source editor which user has installed.
(I think you already implemented with this).
3. There is also pending your pov regarding DanielMaximiliano indications which I also suggested and questioning to you
in this message. Mainly about:
Solution indicated by Daniel: IDE must create the new prg and fmg with the same name of the project and no longer like as Main.prg nor as Main.fmg. ie if the project name will be called Demo1, when IDE shall "creates" with the same name of the project, in this case: Demo1.prg, Demo1.fmg, Demo1.hbc, Demo1.hbp and Demo1.rc. This would avoid the file losing and also avoinding for having to rename the files created by the IDE erroneously.
What do you think Dr. Soto ? This could be approved for correction in the next IDE releases ? We know IDE it is too big but IMHO this is an important correction, doesn't it ?
And now I also have a new question: IDE name executable file given at
last IDE release (version 1.0.3) will be: IDE_ANSI.exe and IDE_UNICODE.exe or will be keept like as IDE.exe on next HMG releases ?. This my question is because I have my tools vinculated with this name.
Your response will be very much appreciated and sorry if I disturbing you Claudio.
Thank you for your attention,
My Best Regards
Remark: What do you think Claudio or Rathi, all these messages about IDE suggestions to be joinned an existing topic (probably
this one) or a new one topic ?